The acquisition of U.S. Steel by Japan’s Nippon Steel has caught the attention of President Joe Biden, who believes that a thorough examination is necessary, according to the White House. The steelworkers union has raised concerns about the transaction, prompting the administration to take action.
Lael Brainard, Director of the National Economic Council, announced that the deal would undergo review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). This committee, composed of representatives from economic and national security agencies, is responsible for investigating potential national security risks associated with foreign investments in American companies.
Brainard emphasized that Biden recognizes the significance of a foreign entity acquiring an American-owned company, even if it is from a close ally. She stressed the importance of scrutinizing the deal’s potential impact on national security and supply chain reliability.
The director stated, “This transaction appears to necessitate careful investigation by the interagency Committee on Foreign Investment, as enabled by Congress and reinforced by the Biden administration. Our administration is prepared to thoroughly analyze the findings of any such investigation and take appropriate action.”
While the all-cash deal, valued at approximately $14.1 billion, will allow U.S. Steel to retain its name and headquarters in Pittsburgh, where it was established in 1901 by J.P. Morgan and Andrew Carnegie, it will become a subsidiary of Nippon Steel. The combined entity will rank among the top three steel-producing companies globally based on 2022 figures reported by the World Steel Association.
The Expanding Powers of the Committee
A Case Study: Beijing Kunlun and Grindr
In 2020, Beijing Kunlun, a Chinese mobile video game company, agreed to sell Grindr, a gay dating app, after receiving an order from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).
United Steelworkers International’s Opposition
United Steelworkers International, which endorsed President Biden’s 2020 presidential campaign, quickly opposed a recent transaction. The union had hoped to work with U.S. Steel in order to keep the company domestically owned and operated. However, U.S. Steel chose to ignore the concerns of their workforce and sell to a foreign-owned company. The union was not consulted prior to the announcement of the sale. President David McCall expressed disappointment and emphasized the need for government regulators to scrutinize the acquisition and ensure it serves the national security interests of the United States.
Opposition from Political Allies
Political allies of President Biden in Pennsylvania, a critical battleground state for his reelection campaign, also objected to the sale. They released statements calling on Nippon, the foreign company involved in the acquisition, to make commitments to keep U.S. Steel’s workers, plants, and headquarters in the state. Some critics described the sale as yet another example of profit-driven executives selling out American workers to foreign companies. Democratic Senators Bob Casey and John Fetterman expressed their concerns and vowed to take action to prevent the sale if necessary, citing national security issues.
Outrage as U.S. Steel Agrees to Sell Themselves to a Foreign Company
In a shocking turn of events, U.S. Steel has recently announced their decision to sell the company to a foreign entity. Many are expressing their outrage and concern over this unexpected move.
The news was met with strong opposition, as evident by Fetterman’s reaction. The politician voiced his absolute disapproval, stating, “It’s absolutely outrageous that U.S. Steel has agreed to sell themselves to a foreign company.” This sentiment echoes the sentiments of many others who fear the potential consequences of this sale.
Given the significance of U.S. Steel within the American industrial landscape, this decision raises several important questions. What will be the implications for American jobs? Will this foreign company maintain the same level of quality and commitment to safety standards?
It is clear that this development warrants further analysis and scrutiny. As the story continues to unfold, concerned parties eagerly await more information and reassurances regarding the future of U.S. Steel in the hands of a foreign owner.
